Monday, February 28, 2011

Random Game #17 - Gajdos vs. Loewy, Sr - Barmen, Germany 1905

The Random Game feature at chessgames.com is a handy way to broaden your chess education. You never know what's going to pop up. You may see a famous classic, or maybe a subtle modernity, or maybe a true obscurity. You might even find a diamond in the rough that nobody else has spotted.


Opernhaus Barmen, Wuppertal, Germany 1905


Today's game took place in Germany in 1905 between Janos Gajdos and Leopold Loewy, Sr. In his Decisive Games in Chess History, Pachman says "The International Barmen Congress, 1905, brought together a greater number of masters and strong amateurs than any other event of that time."

After 40 moves the game seems pretty drawn. But the game isn't over yet. Probably too instructive for my own efforts, you'll want to look this over closely yourself.



If you enjoy the random game idea you can try it yourself here.

Find all of the Random Games posted on the Pied Chessman here.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Random Game #16 - Benaddi vs. Tamimi - Gibraltar Masters 2005

The Random Game feature at chessgames.com is a handy way to broaden your chess education. You never know what's going to pop up. You may see a famous classic, or maybe a subtle modernity, or maybe a true obscurity. You might even find a diamond in the rough that nobody else has spotted.

Today's game between Mohsine Benaddi and Hamad Al Tamimi was played in the 4th round of the Gibraltar Masters tournament in 2005. Neither player is FIDE titled, though Al Tamimi earned an IM norm at this event. It was a five-way tie for first that year. This game is a good example to show that 15 moves of opening theory gets you nothing but maybe a chance. Even at the expert and master levels of FIDE play, a straight tactic, a checkmate pattern decides the whole game. The two players expertly contest an interesting line in the Caro-Kann, but after a single move without checking to make sure of safety, White loses the game in an instant. Definitely material for a Dan Heisman lesson.



If you enjoy the random game idea you can try it yourself here.

Find all of the Random Games posted on the Pied Chessman here.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Endgame Study #12 - S.M. Birnov 1939


Irving Chernev delights us with this whimsical composition which he included in Chessboard Magic! Created by S.M. Birnov, this study is reminiscent of a keyboard exercise for the student pianist. There may be no great endgame principles to discover here, but what a treasure!




Find all of the endgame studies posted on The Pied Chessman here.

Random Game #15 - Larsen vs. Sumar - Mar del Plata 1958


The Random Game feature at chessgames.com is a handy way to broaden your chess education. You never know what's going to pop up. You may see a famous classic, or maybe a subtle modernity, or maybe a true obscurity. You might even find a diamond in the rough that nobody else has spotted.


symbol of Mar del Plata (photo by Erik Stattin)


Today's game between Denmark's Bent Larsen and Julio Sumar of Peru took place at the Mar del Plata tournament in 1958. Larsen went on to win the event with 12 points in 15 rounds suffering only a single loss to Oscar Panno, the local favorite from Buenos Aires.

The chess world lost Bent last year. He and his wife had been living in Buenos Aires, just 250 miles north of where he earned his victory at Mar del Plata.


If you enjoy the random game idea you can try it yourself here.

Find all of the Random Games posted on the Pied Chessman here.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Timely Tactics #5 - Deviatkin vs. Kosteniuk

Alexandra Kosteniuk

Violent, forcing moves should be at the top of the list when looking for candidates. Here we see a position from Andrei Deviatkin vs. Alexandra Kosteniuk from the 2nd round of the recent Aeroflot Open 2011. White has just played 51.Bxg3 and no doubt is looking forward to trading down into an even endgame against the former women's world champion. Alexandra finds the move that sets up the win, though the actual game was eventually drawn. Can you see the right way to go in this position?

See if you can spot the move, then play over the whole game score after the break.


Sunday, February 20, 2011

Timely Tactics #4 - Alsina Leal vs. Kobalia

In this game between Daniel Alsina Leal and Mikhail Kobalia from the 3rd round of the Aeroflot Open 2011, Black actually played the liquidating 37... Qxe1 and went on to get White's resignation in a few moves. But Black has a move that though it may look quieter than the game continuation, will seal the deal. Can you find a better move that would be sure to end the contest?

See if you can spot the move, then play over the whole game score after the break.


Saturday, February 19, 2011

Timely Tactics #3 - Cheparinov vs. Papin

Ivan Cheparinov


This position is from the first round game of Ivan Cheparinov and Vasily Papin in the recently completed Aeroflot Open 2011. Black has just played 18... h6 to push the pesky bishop away. Is the frocked one out of a job? How would you play as White?


See if you can spot the move, then play over the whole game score after the break.


Book Review - The Alterman Gambit Guide by Boris Alterman

If you want to learn how to be a swashbuckling chess player, you need to get The Alterman Gambit Guide by GM Boris Alterman. As the subtitle informs, this book is written from the point of view of the risk taking White player. This isn't a repertoire book. It doesn't claim that on the cover of the book, but you might assume so nevertheless. What it covers is very thorough, but what it omits is something you certainly have to deal with.

In the Danish Gambit, he doesn't cover the vastly most popular Declined Variation with 3... d5 (except to mention that it is best in the Theoretical Overview). Now this omission exactly suits the purpose of the book, how to play gambits, not so much how to deal with those players so unchivalrous as to decline a popular 19th century gambit. But if your expectations are different when you buy the book, you'll surely be disappointed the first time you try out your new gambit and your opponent introduces you to something you've never read about on the 3rd move. Alterman assumes that you can sew up your own repertoire. But he doesn't assume you know that a lead in development is a reason to offer the Danish Gambit, and he mentions it the first time by page 9. As we learn, a gambit is a great laboratory for discovering the general principles of openings.

In the Urusov Gambit, he doesn't cover what to do if you are move ordered into the Two Knights Defense. He clearly reminds you more than once that this is in fact the most common idea that you'll meet. So get yourself a book about that before trying this gambit on for size. But if your opponent accepts the gambit you'll have every tool you need to slaughter the guy.

There aren't many books around on the Evans Gambit. It is arguably the most sound of any popularly reached gambit. If you are interested in giving that a try, I'd call this book absolutely essential reading. But of course, you'd better make yourself ready for everyday things like Italian Game positions before giving it a try. A book such as the Italian Game and the Evans Gambit by Pinski can help fill in those gaps.

You will find a section on the Panov Attack, though I certainly didn't expect it. It's really not a gambit, but as Alterman explains it's a line that certainly must be played in the spirit and honoring the principles of a gambit. And it is popular stuff nowadays which is reached by a few different move orders.

There is also a chapter on the Cochrane Gambit! I'll admit it. I'd never heard of it until I saw it in this book. I dare you to find me another book with a whole chapter on the Cochrane Gambit! Ok, you can probably come up with one, but if it isn't already on your bookshelf then I'm sure it's going to take you a lot of research to find it.

Other opening lines included are the Philidor, the Morphy Attack, the Max Lange Attack, the Morra Gambit, and the Milner-Barry Gambit.

Of particular value are the What We Have Learned lists. Here you'll find things like a summary of a proper middlegame plan for the gambit, or mention of a common trap that you'd best not forget. Also, many chapters include a theory section that summarizes much of what is otherwise spread among the many games analyzed. And here you'll often find mention of transpositions that are possible and may not have been noted elsewhere.

Like me, I'm sure that the majority of potential buyers will be attracted to the book based on the author's great videos about gambits for the ICC. And they really are great videos. They are great to use alongside the book and many more gambits are covered by the videos. But I must tell you that some of the book is really a transcript of his videos. That's certainly good news if you aren't an ICC member. But even where this is true, he has added to the text with games he has played on the ICC which are not in the videos. So I don't see this myself as an issue at all, but again it is important to set your expectations.

In a few words, this book is great! Just at a glance, this book contains more words than chess notation, and it reads all the better for it. Boris strongly believes that learning to play the material and development tradeoffs of gambits is essential to the development of a player, and this book gives you plenty of that. And who can argue with the Russian school of chess? (Though Boris now lives in Israel, he first learned what every Ukranian schoolboy knows.)

Read an excerpt from the publisher here.

Find all of the book reviews on this blog here.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Endgame Study #11 - A A Kotov 1945


Returning to 1357 End-Game Studies by Harold Lommer we find this study apparently attributable to Alexander Alexandrovich Kotov, the only example of his work in the book. Of course, he was well known as a player, but even more so as the author of books such as Think Like a Grandmaster.

Here White has two pawns, but a draw is certain (or even a loss!) unless he plays accurately. Find the right move to begin and visualize the right plan. A walk in the park will be called for.



Find all of the endgame studies posted on The Pied Chessman here.

Timely Tactics #2 - Luka Lenic vs. Le Quang Liem

Hotel Izmailovo, site of the Aeroflot Open 2011
Some moves are harder to see than others. All chessplayers depend on patterns they recognize to shortcut their way to the correct move. But some moves just hide from our attempts to visualize. Moving a piece back to it's original square or sacrificing a queen are examples.

Here we see Le Quang Liem play a move that must have come as a shock to his opponent Luka Lenic in this position from the 3rd round of the recently completed Aeroflot Open in Moscow. Le Quang Liem was the winner of the tournament, defending his win from last year. Lenic has just played 42.Rxb7. What did he miss?

See if you can spot the move, then play over the whole game score after the break.